Being White is Not the Jewish Norm: How the Mishnah Can Help Us Deconstruct a White-normative Approach to Judaism

While white Jews might take for granted that ancient Jews looked like them, the evidence is otherwise.

As white Jews are trying to challenge racism within the Jewish community and in wider American society, many are looking for guidance in traditional Jewish sources. However, there are not many places in the early rabbinic literature that can help us deconstruct such biases.

The Mishnaic tractate Negaim (“Blemishes”) offers one of the few insights into the rabbinic conceptions of race, or rather, distinct human skin colors. The tractate itself deals with various forms of tzara’at, a leprosy-like disease mentioned in the Torah portions Tazria and Metzora. In this context, Negaim 2:1 explains that “the bright [tzara’at] spot in a germani appears as dull white, and the dull white spot in a kushi appears as bright white. Rabbi Ishmael says the children of Israel … are like boxwood, neither black nor white but of an intermediate shade.”

On one level, this mishnah deals with a purely clinical challenge — how to diagnose tzara’at on various shades of skin. Yet it can also help us better understand our ancestors’ relationship to the modern concept of “race,” a category they didn’t share.

The specific terms in this passage are interesting. The mishnah states that a Jews’ skin is unlike that of the germani. This term is probably a loanword from the Latin Germanus and refers to a member of a Germanic tribe. The word occurs in the Mishnah only in the above-cited paragraph. In the Jerusalem Talmud, there is a mention of a germani where it stands for a white person who was enslaved by Rabbi Yodan, a sage who lived in the first half of the fourth century in the Land of Israel (Yoma 41b).[fn][/fn] Apparently, slavery at this point in Jewish history was not based on race. The rabbinic sages seemed to have followed the Roman model of slavery that did not base slavery on race either. Actually, most of those enslaved by the Romans were white, members of Germanic and Slavic tribes: the word “Slavic” itself was borrowed from the Greek sklábos, “slave.”[fn][/fn] The midrashic literature also acknowledges the existence of white and Black slaves alike. (Bereishit Rabbah 86:3) This de-coupling of the skin color from social hierarchy supports the claim that Mediterranean people of late antiquity did have a different concept of race than we do, if they had any at all. This evidence also indicates that the fusion of skin color and social hierarchies is socially constructed and subject to change.

But the Mishnah does not only differentiate Jews from members of the Germanic tribes. It also states that a Jew’s skin is unlike that of a kushi. This word denotes a person from Kush, a kingdom that centered along the Nile Valley in present-day Sudan, to the south of Egypt. The two civilizations were engaged in warfare, trade and cultural exchange for centuries. Kush existed between c. 1070 BCE until 350 C.E. — that is, including the period of the Mishnah. Later on, the Hebrew word kushi came to refer other Black African peoples, too. For instance, when the original Judeo-Arabic script of the 12th-century philosophical work the Kuzari (1:2) mentions the Habesha[fn]”Habesha” is an ethnic or pan-ethnic identifier frequently employed to refer to Semitic language-speaking peoples mainly found in the highlands of present-day Ethiopia and Eritrea.[/fn] peoples, the Hebrew version of the text introduces them as kushi, even though “Habesha” and “Kushitic” are different markers of identity. The Greeks called Kush “Aethiopia,” which means literally “burnt-face.” Due to Greek cultural dominance, many, including Jewish translators, would later translate kushi as Ethiopian.

Thus, as the Mishnah states, Jews are neither like the germani, nor like the kushi. Instead, the Jews’ skin has, according to the Mishnah, an “intermediate shade.” This rabbinic perception of the Jews’ skin color as brown follows those Egyptian papyri that stated that Jews were “honey-colored.”[fn][/fn] The Mishnaic observation also reflects the self-description of other Mediterranean peoples, such as Greeks and Romans, who would describe their skin color as “medius inter nigrum et pallidum” — that is, “halfway between black and pale” (De Physiognomonia liber 88).[fn];brand=default;docId=dlt000123/dlt000123.xml[/fn]

To illustrate the Jews’ “intermediate shade,” the Mishnah uses the metaphor of the “boxwood.” The genus of the boxwood is native to many parts of the world, including the Middle East.[fn][/fn] In other parts of the Mishna and in the Babylonian Talmud, this word is referenced only as a material that people made furniture out of (e.g., Yoma 3:9, Bava Batra 89b). Interestingly enough, boxwood is associated with Jews also in non-Jewish civilizations: in the Islamic hadith literature, there is a teaching that boxwood — in Arabic: gharqad — is “a tree of the Jews” (Sahih Muslim 2922). Until today, Muslim extremists refer to the boxwood as a traitor among the trees that will protect Jews from God’s and/or the Muslims’ wrath, as seen for example in the 1988 Hamas Charter.[fn][/fn]

But even if our ancestors identified as “boxwood-skinned” and distanced themselves from the whiteness of the germani, this should not change 21st-century white American Jews self-identification as white. Even if antisemitism in the United States is as violent as probably never before, white Jews do benefit from white privilege. Nevertheless, learning about our ancestors’ self-identification as Jews of color might help to challenge the widespread assumption among American Jews that being white is the Jewish norm. Since Jewish congregations in the United States are dominated by white Jews, white Jews have often trouble with perceiving Jews of Color as if they were genuine part of the community. Even if white Jews acknowledge that some Sephardic and Mizrahi Jews are people of color, that does not change the widespread attitude that whiteness is the Jewish norm. This hegemonial whiteness can manifest itself also among well-intended white Jews who seek to support Jews of Color, arguing that “we were strangers in Egypt and know the soul of the stranger.” But Jews of Color are no strangers, they are no visitors. White Jews do not own Judaism.

Today, of course, there are not only Jews who are “boxwood-skinned,” but also Jews who are white like the germani or Black as the kushi. The rabbinic sages’ self-identification as people of color can help dismantle the current white normative approach to Judaism. While white Jews might take for granted that ancient Jews looked like them, the evidence is otherwise. We can assume that it was not only the authors of the Mishnah who identified as Jews of Color, but also the authors of other traditional Jewish texts. Whether we are using an Ashkenazi or non-Ashkenazi siddur, we are reading prayers that were mostly compiled by Jews of Color. Abraham, Sarah and the other ancestors mentioned in our daily prayers were not white either. Every time we read the Torah or other books of the Hebrew Bible, we are reading works written and edited by Jews of Color. Reflecting on our “boxwood-skinned” heritage might help white Jews recognize that being white is not the Jewish norm.







Armin Langer is a student at the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College. He is the author of the book Ein Jude in Neukölln: Mein Weg zum Miteinander der Religionen(A Jew in Neukölln: My Path to the Coexistence of Religions) and the editor of the anthology Fremdgemacht and Reorientiert: Jüdisch-Muslimische Verflechtungen (Foreign and Reoriented: Jewish-Muslim Entanglements). He is currently completing his Ph.D. in sociology at Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany.

8 Responses

  1. This has been very enlightening and a pleasure to read. I hope this research will continue into mainstream living which may bring about peaceful understandings of the human race. Please continue your works!!

  2. With the advance in technology, great number of black American and people in the Caribbean are finding out their Israelite roots. Obviously the knowledge of their identity brings excitement but also anger. How do you foster better relation between all the Israelite groups regardless of color.? How do you achieve healthy discussion among them?

  3. I found this article very interesting it never occurred to me that someone of the white Jewish community whatever admit that Jews of yesterday could not have been dominated by whiteness or blackness but somewhere in between it deems reasonable considering the geographical area in which Israel it stated to have existed thank you for your honesty and your intellectual powers on this subject I look forward to seeing more of your articles and by the way I am a black American and I see Jews as a Mosaic pattern of humanity thanks again

  4. Very interesting, I wish more truth will be revealed on a super natural way to bring truth and end the lies told for too long. Black people like me are targets and it’s got to stop ✋️…I prayer that my 8 grandchildren will live in a world based on truth and that be love and respected based on their character and not their color. That they be given the same opportunities to succeed in their lives and not be judged by their looks. I don’t know what that feels like but I hope one day they’ll know what that feels like 🙏

  5. WOW! Finally.. hearing the truth about the original Jews is absolutely a breath of fresh air. Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge, which makes you a wise man because enlightenment of the truth is divine wisdom.
    Esther Osayande

  6. Your open mindedness for truth is wonderful. You know that there is only one race of people; the human race. Human examples of diversity in multiple colors is shown in Israel through Jacob (4 Mothers, 12 sons, multiple hues) and in the robe of Joseph of multiple colors. Also, Jews (Judah) comprises only 1/12 of the House of Israel. The Lost Tribes dispersed through the nations (assimilated also by color) are still in need of gathering together.
    Beliel has used ignorance, separation, pride (haughtiness) as tools against us, and will continue to do so, as long as we allow it. The time of Ezekiel 37 is at hand.

    May you be Blessed for publishing truth of the WORD.

  7. I grew up with the notion that brown skin color was normative for Jews. The notion that “white” is normative is still jarring. (I was born in 1946.)

  8. Thanks for clearing that up for me. I am not Jewish, but always assumed that jewish people are white. Watching history about the Holocaust, you see that most Jewish people appear to be white. I’ve been watching the news a lot about what’s happening in Israel right now and have been confused by the color of the skin of the Israelites. I’ve been doing a lot of family history, and have found that I may have Jewish ancestors. I’m looking forward to finding out more about those ancestors.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Resources

February 5, 2024
Posted in Race
Narratives can be shaped and reshaped, often omitting crucial truths, particularly regarding racial issues in America.
August 6, 2023
Posted in Race
The process of reparations requires a transformation of the soul of America.
June 4, 2023
Posted in Race
We must bring to life that world where the tzelem Elohim (image of the Divine) of every person is recognized and can shine out.
June 4, 2023
Posted in Race
Our children inhabit a race-based society and receive messages about how to apply racial labels.
February 6, 2023
Posted in Race
A Purim drash
January 3, 2023
Posted in Justice, Race
How might we understand reparations as a Jewish issue?

The Reconstructionist Network

Serving as central organization of the Reconstructionist movement

Training the next generation of groundbreaking rabbis

Modeling respectful conversations on pressing Jewish issues

Curating original, Jewish rituals, and convening Jewish creatives

Get the latest from Evolve delivered to your inbox.

The Reconstructionist Network